Auto-create PRs for fixes

Severity: Recommended

When AI identifies a fixable error, it should be able to propose a fix as a PR, not just report the problem.

Check automatically:

1. Check for automated PR creation workflows:

# PR creation in scripts
grep -riE "create.*pr|create.*pull|gh pr create|octokit.*pull" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py" --include="*.yml" scripts/ jobs/ .github/workflows/ 2>/dev/null | head -10

2. Check for Sentry → GitHub integration:

# Error to PR pipeline
grep -riE "sentry.*github|sentry.*pr|error.*fix.*pr|auto.*fix" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py" . 2>/dev/null | grep -v node_modules | head -10

3. Check for AI-assisted fix workflows:

# Claude/AI fix automation
grep -riE "claude.*fix|ai.*pr|automated.*fix|auto.*patch" .github/workflows/*.yml scripts/ CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null

If not found in code, ask user:

• "When Claude identifies a fixable error, does it create a PR automatically?"
• "Is there a workflow from 'error detected' → 'fix proposed' → 'PR opened'?"
• "What's the human approval step before AI-generated fixes merge?"

Cross-reference with:

• ERR-006 (AI review identifies what to fix)
• ERR-008 (triage determines which errors warrant auto-fix)
• FLOW-002 (AI + human PR review)

Pass criteria:

• Workflow exists: Sentry error → AI analysis → PR created
• PRs are clearly labeled as AI-generated
• Human review required before merge (not fully autonomous)

Fail criteria:

• No automated PR creation from errors
• Fixes are always manual (human writes code after seeing error)

Partial (acceptable):

• AI suggests fix in Slack/issue but doesn't create PR (human opens PR)
• PR creation exists but not connected to Sentry (manual trigger)

Evidence to capture:

• PR creation workflow
• Labeling/tagging for AI-generated PRs
• Human review requirement

---